Time for Wikileaks to come clean
Tasman TimesJames Gruzman
24 August 2010
Julian Assange of the whistle-blowing website Wikileaks was charged with rape in Sweden. Within hours the charges were dropped. Assange has claimed that Australian intelligence warned him on August 11 of a possible campaign against him.
This raises a major question. Why would one intelligence organization tip you off about another intelligence organization? Intelligence organisations work together and share information.
It doesn’t make sense for an intelligence organization that deals in secrets wanting to tip off an organization that prides itself in divulging secrets. Ultimately intelligence organisations should want Wikileaks to fail if it is legitimate so that people within the intelligence community can’t reveal secrets to it.
If this is a staged event by Wikileaks and the likely intelligence organisations behind it, then it could be used to boost the credibility of Assange and Wikileaks, giving the public the perception that the Pentagon or intelligence agencies are trying to smear Assange and shut Wikileaks down.
It is also unusual to see the government cheerleaders (mainstream media) giving Assange and Wikileaks so much attention. If Wikileaks were a legitimate thorn in the side of the government, you wouldn't see the media reporting on everything that it releases.
Army intelligence analyst Bradley Manning has had criminal charges filed against him by the US Army for allegedly leaking information to Wikileaks. Who would want to provide information to Wikileaks if you get arrested and charged? It isn’t as secure as they claim.
When asked about the September 11 attacks in an interview by the Belfast Telegraph Assange responded:
"I'm constantly annoyed that people are distracted by false conspiracies such as 9/11, when all around we provide evidence of real conspiracies, for war or mass financial fraud."
There is a huge amount of evidence of a government cover-up and involvement in 9/11. It would be safe to say that Assange’s controllers don’t want him to let the cat out of the bag on 9/11. Only release information that makes Pakistan look like the enemy to justify action against them.
Join Tasman Times on facebook here.
Comments (1)
Tasman Times;
There is a basic misunderstanding in the above article.
Its assumption is that all 'intelligence' or 'intelligence info' or gatherers is/are the same. It -and they -are not.
There are people, believe it or not, who work in the Government who whistleblow or divulge information to the press. Information gathering goes on right across the board.
No one made the claim that putting out information was 'secure' in the way you are inferring..
You said ; Who would want to provide information to Wikileaks if you get arrested and charged? It isn’t as secure as they claim.'
Again more disinfo. The 'security' was in answer to spurious allegations that the leaked info jeopardised troops in Iraq. This is why names have been blacked out of documents.
You should try putting out and proselytising the information that wikileaks has made available in the public domain eg; shootings at road blocks, mass murder, torture of children etc, instead of piggy backing with your silly 'uncovering' of 'who controls what'.
We KNOW who is in charge.
You can name bankers and the oligarch families - the Rothschilds, Rockerfellers, the Windsors, the banking cartel, the industrial military complex - we know all this.
The information is out there.
Stop wasting time by playing a game of russian dolls - the conspiracy within a conspiracy within a conspiracy - taking it up into the ether of non action.
Wikileaks has provided info on what the US and UK forces are doing and planning in Iraq - it is now up to you to tell as many people as possible about this.
I have given you the above names. You dont have to 'prove' or 'uncover' as much as you now have to get -
out and DO SOMETHING.
#1 - vigo - 10/25/2010 - 18:34